Last updated: October 2026. Every tool detail below is checked against this directory’s own published entries, current as of July 2026.
Every vendor demo sounds complete. The gap shows up later, in the plan you signed, the engine that turns out to be an upsell, or the seat limit nobody mentioned until invoice two. The 22 questions below sort into the same five weighted fields this directory uses in its published 100-point formula: coverage, execution, ease of use, value, and transparency.
The 22-question checklist
Work through each group in order. A pattern of weak answers in one group shows exactly where a product is thin.
Coverage (25 points)
Coverage decides whether a tool sees the AI engines your customers actually use.
| # | Question | Why It Matters | Weak-Answer Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Which AI engines does it track today, not on a roadmap? | Coverage is 25 of 100 points here. | ”Coming soon” next to a core engine on the pricing page. |
| 2 | Does the data come from a real interface, or an API call alone? | An API response does not always match what a person sees. | The rep cannot explain how the tool pulls its answers. |
| 3 | Is full coverage included at the entry price? | A vendor can advertise five engines and sell just one at the homepage price. | The entry tier tracks one engine; the rest need an upgrade. |
| 4 | How often does each engine’s data refresh? | A weekly refresh misses a change an AI answer makes mid-week. | Cadence is described only as “regularly.” |
| 5 | Does coverage include your brand’s market and language? | An English answer does not guarantee correct tracking elsewhere. | The rep cannot name a supported language list. |
Execution (25 points)
Execution decides whether a finding becomes finished work or another chart to review.
| # | Question | Why It Matters | Weak-Answer Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Does a gap turn into a brief, a draft, or a fix in the same account? | Execution is 25 of 100 points here. | The roadmap shows a chart and a CSV export, nothing more. |
| 7 | Does the tool name the exact source page behind an answer? | A source URL tells you what to fix; a mention count only tells you something changed. | The report says “mentioned,” with no source attached. |
| 8 | Does it queue fixes, or only list them? | A queue you can assign moves work forward. | Gaps appear as a list to copy into another tool, the way Peec AI’s Actions queue names a fix but does not create or publish it. |
| 9 | Is there a dedicated content editor, or a scoring pass? | A live-scoring editor speeds up drafting; Surfer builds its whole product around one. | The “content module” is a template generator with no live feedback. |
| 10 | Can it check technical site health, not just visibility? | An engine has to crawl and parse a page before it can cite it. | No audit feature, and no partner tool recommended instead. |
Ease of use (20 points)
Ease of use decides how fast a team without a specialist reaches a usable result.
| # | Question | Why It Matters | Weak-Answer Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | How long from signup to a usable first finding? | Measured from account creation to a result an analyst can act on without training. | Onboarding needs a scheduled call before any data shows. |
| 12 | Does reading the dashboard require SEO training? | A specialist tool slows down a generalist team on day one. | The demo leans on jargon the rep has to stop and define. |
| 13 | What does the free trial actually unlock? | A trial can mean full access or a locked demo running sample data. | The trial account cannot connect a real domain. |
| 14 | How many clicks separate a finding from an assigned task? | Every extra click is a place a finding gets dropped. | Assigning a finding means exporting it into another tool first. |
Value (20 points)
Value decides whether the advertised price survives contact with a real program.
| # | Question | Why It Matters | Weak-Answer Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Does the price include the prompt, engine, and seat count you need? | The cheapest advertised tier is not always the real entry point. | The price only holds at a prompt count too small for one brand. |
| 16 | Are seats, projects, and client brands capped, or unlimited? | A per-seat charge changes the real cost the moment a second person joins. | Adding a teammate adds a new line item to the invoice. |
| 17 | Is the AI feature priced alone, or bundled onto a separate paid product? | A price that only applies after another purchase is not the real floor. | Billed as an “add-on,” the way Semrush lists its AI Visibility Toolkit atop a Semrush SEO plan that starts near $140 a month on its own. |
| 18 | What does the next tier cost, and what does it unlock? | A cheap entry tier that jumps to enterprise pricing is not a real starting point. | The step to full-feature pricing is five times the entry price or more. |
| 19 | Does annual billing state an exact discount? | ”Save up to X%” is not a published rate you can check. | No specific percentage is stated anywhere on the page. |
Transparency (10 points)
Transparency decides how much of the above you can check yourself, before a sales call.
| # | Question | Why It Matters | Weak-Answer Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Is pricing published, or gated behind a sales call? | A published rate is the only pricing you can check without handing over contact information first. | Every plan past the entry tier reads “Contact us.” |
| 21 | Can you cancel from account settings, not a form or a call? | A buried cancellation path signals something about the whole relationship. | The cancellation link routes to a contact form. |
| 22 | Does the vendor’s site match what independent listings report? | A claim you cannot trace to a source is not a verified claim. | A stated feature or price is not on the vendor’s own site. |
Worked example: running the checklist on Profound
Run four questions against Profound, this directory’s citation-attribution specialist. The pattern that emerges is a real strength paired with a real limit, not a clean pass or fail.
| Question | Profound’s answer | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Q1: Engines tracked today? | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Copilot, plus models beyond that core set. | Strong answer. |
| Q3: Full coverage at the entry price? | No. The $99 Starter plan tracks ChatGPT only; multi-engine coverage needs the $399 Growth plan. | Weak-answer flag. |
| Q7: Names the exact source? | Yes. Citation maps show which pages an answer pulled from, and how often. | Strong answer. |
| Q16: Seats or brands capped? | Yes. One property per paid account, with no agency workspace. | Weak-answer flag. |
Two strong answers and two weak-answer flags do not disqualify Profound. They show what it is built for: one enterprise brand that needs page-level evidence, not an agency running several accounts on one shared budget. That is the point of running the checklist: a clear answer for each question, not one blended score.
Score your own shortlist
Copy the table into a spreadsheet, and score two or three tools against every question in one sitting. The pattern that emerges, not any single answer, is what should move a vendor from a shortlist to a signed contract.
See how every tool in this directory scores against the same five criteria on the AI SEO tools index.